>115hp/liter. >No vtec. >fully stock, wide torque band, perfectly driveable in traffic

>115hp/liter
>No vtec
>fully stock, wide torque band, perfectly driveable in traffic
I kneel

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eggcel, McShits, lol @that torque gap

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      170ish @2500rpm ain't bad for a 2l like that

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        no way are those figures legit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          They aren't, the engine is 2.4 not 2.0

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's probably corrected for flywheel power

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            no that would be 275hp

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            ......but the GR86 doesn't produce 275hp, it produces about 230 FLYWHEEL hp just like this graph, which would suggest the graph is corrected for flywheel figures.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            are all the dyno runs ever done and posted online corrected then? well they are probably all corrected for ambient temp and pressure, but they are not corrected for drivetrain loss and everyone gets over 210 whp just like the cold figure in the graph.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >everyone gets 210whp
            >just like you'd expect for a car that has ~230 flywheel horsepower

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's rwd stupid

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you confused?
            When was that ever disputed.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            losing 20 hp would make sense if it was fwd. being rwd the loss is probably 35hp

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Evidently not
            >no but muh secret underrated

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            evident from what

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            evident from the FACT the car has ~230 flywheel horsepower and dynos at 210whp

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They only make that much on a dynojet(happy dyno). On a Mustang Dyno they get around 200whp which is right on for 15% drivetrain loss.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I guess you're not the guy I'm replying to since your post is agreeing with my prevailing point.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Your point is illegitimate. The only people that are getting 210hp or more have all been ran on Dynojets or Mustang Dynos fudged to use to mimic their more optimistic figures. Again, on an accurate dyno(Dyno Dynamics or Mustang Dyno) they put down right what they're rated at. Only morons look at dynojet numbers and think something is underrated.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Your point is illegitimate
            What do you think my point is?
            Because judging by your post, my point isn't what you think my point is.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            How about you clearly state a point instead of playing woman-like guessing games?

            the car is underrated. that is a random forum post.
            deal with it.

            >doesn't post a single dyno dynamics or mustang dyno(without fudged correction standards) that makes 210whp or more
            Wow, you really showed me moron.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >guessing games
            Don't reply to my posts if you don't know wtf I'm talking about lol
            My point is that the GR86 DOESN'T secretly have 275 flywheel hp like OP seems to believe.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            OK i'll revise it down to 262. happy?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            What about what about what about
            Get this get this
            What if it just has the 232hp Toyota says it has?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            OK i'll revise it down to 262. happy?

            You've claimed the car made "210whp", again MY point was that's only on a dynojet. Meaning you're still being generous with the HP measurement. Are you too stupid to understand this?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh look the mustang dynos actually read more
            stupid boomer

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are we going through this again?

            https://i.imgur.com/UV9J1Re.png

            see
            [...]
            moron.

            Dynojets give a 13% optimistic reading on average. Also, dyno's are for measuring gains. Anyone can frick up measurements with correction factors to make a car look good.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            you can't have it both ways you ignorant ass

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not that guy but a thing can be inaccurate -and- imprecise. Dynos are most useful for tuning, where you are doing timing sweeps second by second and before/after comparisons within minutes, not bragging rights numbers. If you want to brag about this engine, find me a real world acceleration result that isn't that C&D paid ad. You two really seem to like arguing though so keep going if it makes you happy.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Dynos are most useful for tuning, where you are doing timing sweeps second by second and before/after comparisons within minutes, not bragging rights numbers.
            This, and it's specifically why I posted that guy using dynojet parameters. It's simply to make himself feel better, it's not that the car actually makes that much power. Hence why even Gen2s can't seem to break into the 5s 0-60mph or out of the 14s.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it will do 5s with the right wheels/tires fully warmed up and a good driver

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Will it though?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Post evidence that isn't c&d.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            how could you prove it other than doing it yourself

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Shitty cell phone video, dragy, torque app, I don't think a lack of tools for documenting is the issue here.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            i'm not doing 0-60 runs that's for moronic 20 year olds and youtubers

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ok go do a quarter mile like some moronic boomer.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >go do 100 mph on a public road
            that's worse

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Don't worry your ET won't be 100mph.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            *Trap speed

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >go do 100 mph on a public road
            that's worse

            >hurr I'm gonna break my car and go to jail from doing a pull
            What sort of limp wristed homosexualry is this? Back to r*ddit with your b***h ass.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You've linked two different anons, if you say 210whp is generous that only reinforces my point that the car does not have more than 232 flywheel horsepower.
            Please pay more attention to the posts you reply to anon.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            do you have prion disease

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            see

            Your point is illegitimate. The only people that are getting 210hp or more have all been ran on Dynojets or Mustang Dynos fudged to use to mimic their more optimistic figures. Again, on an accurate dyno(Dyno Dynamics or Mustang Dyno) they put down right what they're rated at. Only morons look at dynojet numbers and think something is underrated.

            moron.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the car is underrated. that is a random forum post.
            deal with it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Is what it actually makes for horsepower
        I promise you it's not making 170 at the wheels @2.5k

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          that's from rolling onto the throttle

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That must be the 2.4. 2.0s don't make that power and torque without serious mods

            no it's not

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        These morons in this board don’t have a clue what you’re even talking about

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's also not a 2L, but I'll agree that hitting peak torque at 2500 and staying plateaued for another 4500 RPMs is impressive.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >meanwhile, over in the magical land of 1990s Honda Civics with a few simple mods

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can hear the cat less exhaust bouncing off the rev limiter

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        BRAPSTUTUTUTTUTUTUTUT

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >115hp/liter
    so, like, 115 hp, pathetic
    if it was a good size engine, at very least 3.5 liters, it'd be 400 horsepower, kind of low end for a sportscar but acceptable for 30 thousand dollars, you get what you pay for

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      a cayman gts is 4 liters and barely 400hp and costs 100k

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are gaming to a pointless metric. In terms of hp/lb engine weight, or just hp, the brz engine is shit.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          specific output is pointless? news to me and all engineers

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ya, just add displacement, dumbass

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can someone explain why hp/L matters and is not just a cope? Pretend I live in a non-shithole where engines up to and above 8L are common and not taxed anymore than your 1.6L shitbox

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you need 8L to make 160 hp your motor is either hilariously shit or "refined"
      If you make 160hp on 2L naturally aspirated you are efficient and even kind of peppy if that small motor is in a lightweight car.
      It's just measuring how good a motor is at making power with the displacement, if it was the only metric that mattered in driving it means that super sport bikes and formula one cars are peak design and everything else is a waste when that obviously isn't the case.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        So do you get a head start in races if you have a tiny cuck engine

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        bikes do that because they're allowed to pollute for some reason

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's an emissions compliance metric. Case and point: brz has good hp/l but is slow af

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What is torque
        Displacement cope.
        Yeah we fricking get it. 1970-80s big V8s fricking suck due to emissions, choked down carbs/heads/cams but trying putting your 1.6 Honda rice cooker in an Eldorado and see how quickly the pistons enter atmosphere

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Who cares about pigfat yank shit mate? Embarrassing cars for overweight hispanics and geriatrics
          Anything over 1200kg is a mistake

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >A britbong
            Adults are talking, you fricking cuck.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Seems to work fine. You know they put 4 cylinders in silverados now? Also choked big blocks really only put down 300tq to the wheels. A 4.8 LS can easily put that down with h/c/i. Hell, a v6 out of a camaro can almost put that down now

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Honestly, with a proper 6 speed transmission, a Hyundai 2.0 could scoot that beast as well as the 460/3spd auto.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >What is gearing?
          Ugga Ugga

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it means that super sport bikes and formula one cars are peak design

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't matter but it's also not a cope. It's a solid metric for how performance optimised an engine is

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        HP/L is a measure of how much air an engine flows, not how efficiently it flows that air.

        The only thing HP/L indicates is the intake pressure at a given RPM at a given power. I could build a 15,000RPM 1 liter that makes 200HP, I'd rather drive a 5000 RPM 5 liter v8 that makes 200HP.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          HP is a measure of how much air an engine flows, not HP/l

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            they're all relative and correlative with each other, get your head out of your ass

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're wrong and also a homosexual
            kys moron

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            incorrect

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            HP/L is a measure of how much air an engine flows, not how efficiently it flows that air.

            The only thing HP/L indicates is the intake pressure at a given RPM at a given power. I could build a 15,000RPM 1 liter that makes 200HP, I'd rather drive a 5000 RPM 5 liter v8 that makes 200HP.

            HP is a measure of TORQUE you fricking homosexuals. The only metric worth bringing up is power to weight

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sure. If youre going in a straight line

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            correct

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine foregoing F1 level performance for some dump truck performance. A true connoisseur

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If a single gr86/brz owner can do better for 1/8th or 0-60 than my ND Miata on winter tires with TCS on I'll apologize for slandering your engine.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what app is that

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        don't worry about it, wrenchlet

        yeah this is a rigged dyno SAGE. a BRZ is not making more WHP than 4.6L 2V.

        crackhead

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Torque. it's dated but still good for what you get. recommend not using a cheap $20 obd device, they are slow can't handle lots of data.

        don't worry about it, wrenchlet
        [...]
        crackhead

        frick off wannabe

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          pre obd can't make use of that

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >0-60mph is 5.8s
      >0-100kph (62mph) is 6.4s
      Your app is shit or it takes you 0.6secs to gain 2mph lol
      Why do Yanks care about launches and times from 0? When the frick are you ever at a standstill in your car unless you're a draggay or a city nonce

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        yeah true a better metric is 60-130 to measure tourque when your in the powerband and how useable your high end.

        60-130 is the standard metric for drag racing nowadays since it paints the whole picture

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        2-3 is at 62 and I went a bit too aggressive and got wheel spin/TCS fuel cutoff so the app is accurate. Launching is the most common situation if you live in a city, but honestly I just like poking at the brz struggling to come within 0.4s of its c&d 0-60. I know that's with rollout, ideal conditions, etc etc but they are generally optimistic and not blatantly false. A plane Jane skyactiv economy car motor is just as high performance as the goofy boxer.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The 2-3 redline for the GR86/BRZ is at 60 mph, hence the same delay you feel getting to 62 in your Miata.
          60 is an arbitrary number and in a longer pull an 86 is going to beat out an ND2, obviously.

          Lets see your 0-100 mph figures.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's more like 61.15791 mph

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      is that time off the cars speedo or gps?
      anyway, both cars can do a very similar time stock. miata has a faster 0-30 because of better grip (standard tire pressure is 29psi vs 35psi) and may have better traction control as well. 30-60 the 86 will be way faster because of the engine.
      If you care about 0-60 then you would pick the one with the better engine obviously since that is the most expensive thing to improve.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Car speedo/OBD2. On paper I'd agree with you but real world results for the gr86 have been strangely underwhelming.

        The 2-3 redline for the GR86/BRZ is at 60 mph, hence the same delay you feel getting to 62 in your Miata.
        60 is an arbitrary number and in a longer pull an 86 is going to beat out an ND2, obviously.

        Lets see your 0-100 mph figures.

        I'm not committing a felony for boredom, so the 0-77 from the eighth mile will have to do.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      stock v6 mustang numbers. nice!

      https://i.imgur.com/u1MEteH.png

      >115hp/liter
      >No vtec
      >fully stock, wide torque band, perfectly driveable in traffic
      I kneel

      >claims 115hp/liter
      >engine is 2.4l
      >graph doesn't show greater than 240hp
      ya goofed

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        specific output is with crank hp stupid

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          then why did he use a chassis dyno as OP pic stupid

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >115hp/liter
    >No vtec
    >fully stock, wide torque band, perfectly driveable in traffic
    Literally 65 yearold accomplishment.
    homosexual.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >115hp/L
      >7L motor
      This homie cant math

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >thinks a 7L engine can't make 805hp

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Thinks that 60s Ford 7L made >800hp
          Black person brain

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I know a rich trust fund douchebag that bought an orange '27 t-bucket roadster cover car that had a factory aluminum block SOHC (1 of 2 known to have been cast) that dyno'd at just over 800hp.
            (He had pulled the engine out because it was too much for a t-bucket and was waiting for the right project vehicle to drop it in).
            He was also in possession of the Frakenstude at the time.

            So yes, it's an accomplishmemt that was achieved 65 years ago.

    • 2 months ago
      Anοnymουs

      https://i.imgur.com/u1MEteH.png

      >115hp/liter
      >No vtec
      >fully stock, wide torque band, perfectly driveable in traffic
      I kneel

      >Be toyota
      >create shitboxes with 3k engine
      >most make about 50 to 70 hp
      >1166cc but engine is like a 1200cc bike engine that can be revved the hell out
      >make new head with ohc
      >tune and set rev limit to 9000 rpm
      >engine makes 183hp

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>No vtec
    Dumb ricer it has cam phasing on intake and exhaust. You said "no v tek" like it was fixed camshafts, that's why you're a ricer. Also that's pretty decent power/tq

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      vtec works completely differently stupid

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        no fricking shit, post your toolbox you homosexual ricer. OH WAIT, it doesn't exist.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          not an argument

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          career mechanics with toolboxes generally hate and are shit at blueprinting engines.

          • 2 months ago
            throw ricers from buildings

            >blueprinting
            Who the frick is even talking about building an engine. The homosexual ricer said the brz made x amount of power with "no v tek", the homosexual said it like the head that's on there is a fixed cam head, as in no lift control and no timing control. He failed to realize he outed himself as a homosexual spec sheet moron with no tools when he posted that. No turbo, 86mm stroke and it's making all of its torque not too far off idle.
            >THERES NO VE-TEACK BRO WOW!!
            >MECHANICS CANT BLOOPRONT ENGINES DUDE
            fricking dumbass ADHD ricer, wrenchlet

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            there is no lift control fricking moron

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            ...man you're an idiot. Last (You) from me. Any other replay you get will be from ricer enablers.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            yeah this is a rigged dyno SAGE. a BRZ is not making more WHP than 4.6L 2V.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        mechanically it functions differently yes, but its purpose is the same, almost everything has variable cams now

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >duration and lift is the same thing as timing
          wrenchlet!!! hurr durr, ricer!

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          don't ever reply for me

          >duration and lift is the same thing as timing
          wrenchlet!!! hurr durr, ricer!

          >HURRR DURRR NO B-TEK OKAY
          fricking ricer, no tools, moron

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            still not an argument

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Bro I'm not here to argue with you, I'm here to let you know you're a homosexual ricer with no tools just like your dad.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          almost everything has variable cams except for purpose built race motors. when you design and build an engine you choose the powerband yourself. you can fit a larger duration cam and more lift without VVT

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dumbass fricking ricer

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      still not an argument

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Mustang dyno
    Don't these read like 200hp higher than most other dynos?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >200hp higher
      you have no tools

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Says the guy believing the bullshit marketing wank from the bolt on company.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the absolute frick are you even talking about you moronic wrenchlet, homosexual, ricer? Stick to discussing LED lighting and infotainment systems you dumb helpless frick.

  10. 2 months ago
    ricer killer

    >w-w-wannabe!!
    ricer, no-tools

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >THERES NOT EVEN ANY VE-TACK DUDE!!

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >YOURE NOT EVEN BLOOPRONTING YOUR ENGINE BRO!!!!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I guarantee you don’t even know what intake centerline is.
      stay mad low iq homosexual.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i think he's mad

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Horsepower per liter is the statistic that Europeans cucked by regulations pull out of their ass every time they have to justify a low horsepower car. Nobody cares if your car is efficient if it's slow. Stop it, it's sad. Tell your government that regulations that concern engine displacement are harmful to the consumer, creating more waste due to overstressed engines that die early.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      /thread
      power is power, weight is weight, displacement is irrelevant

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >car makes 217hp
    >MUSTANG DYONS READ 200HP TOO HIGH

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >/>27459866
    how about suck the centerline of my dick you moronic fricking ricer, no tools

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Tested by a company that sells performance "tunes"
    Yeah that's credible

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I own the new BRZ, it really is a good engine, for me it's the boxer smoothness. Plus with a catback it sounds amazing and again very smooth due to being N/A and relatively high revving.
    900BRZ seems to have already found a solution for oil starvation so we're close to having reliability on top of a great engine, on par with the likes of the S2000, E30 M3 Evo 2 or 190E Evo which for me are the best 4bangers ever.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >boxer smoothness
      i have one and it's rough as hell

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They also sound bad for a 4 cylinder in my opinion but I guess that's subjective...

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i don't feel like it's subjective mines clearly misfiring 10-20 times a minute at idle

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            ROFL aftermarket cam, shitty tune, or just damaged?

            >No vtec
            No buy

            VTEC, VVT-i, 'skyactiv', everyone has their own branding but who cares? The whole 'vtec engaged' bullshit means the engine is limited before you hit VTEC RPMs, I'd much rather have a modern variable system that can actually put out decent torque under 5k rpms.

            Still no brz/gr86 Bros with a sub-6s 0-60 or decent 1/8th1/4 time? I know that's not what they're good at but c'mon, surely someone actually owns one and has timed it...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            not modded at all, basically has been like that since I got it. never overrevved or anything.
            I don't think they adjusted valves correctly at the factory.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        swear to christ it's the smoothest engine I've ever driven, and I had an e46 330ci with the inline 6 prior to this

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    that's a good fricking torque curve, no?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >No vtec
    No buy

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >115hp/liter
    >Engine 2.4 L FA24D H4
    >Power output 231–235 PS (170–173 kW; 228–232 hp)

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >street ricers swinging dicks about .47g
    Lmfao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Like I said last thread, I realize it's a slap fight between morons but another anon pointed out that real world numbers seem especially far behind C&D results so now I'm curious.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        bro its literally a car made for people too "manly" for a miata. Anyone serious would buy something fun

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >200hp
    you could just buy a sportbike for less and that even comes with a car delete standard

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      can you stay in your containment thread

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what was that about hp/liter again?

        there's a reason Honda doesn't bother to make sportscars

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          where's your sub 7 minute burger ring time? you guys keep going around there and dying

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            there are perfectly good streets right outside

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            why do you guys keep going on it then?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >where's your sub 7 minute burger ring time?
            wheres yours lamo, kys you scared homosexual

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            not an argument

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            kys you molymeems loving homosexual, wrenchlet, ricer. Fricking parrot, follower, sheep.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            still not an argument

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's too gay in there they have to come annoy everyone else

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>No vtec
    You still got Ti VCT. Thats cheating enough. Having an engine that acts as an egr one minute. Then the next has perfect valve overlap at all rpms for performance.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >wide torque band
    >under 200ftlb
    sad

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      a wider power band means you can stay in lower gears longer and that makes a pretty big impact on actual wheel torque. ie. what matters is power

  26. 2 months ago
    Sage all ugly slow gay cars

    LOL @ these ricelets arguing over who the bigger ricer is. The 86 will always be ugly, slow, and gay. C'est la vie you fricking weeblet 4cylinderlet ricelet stancelets

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >graph doesnt start at 0rpm
    every car has a wonderfully flat torque curve from 3000rpm to 3000rpm

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      KYS moronic EV shill

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        negative iq reply

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The Dyno starts at around 1800. Expecting lower only makes sense for diesels and EVs, you shouldn't stand on the gas pedal at idle you moronic wrenchlet.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >can pay half the money for a mildly used base V6 camaro, a considerably faster and better sports car
    Unless you intend to super/turbo an 86 you should not be talking about its performance in comparison to any other car.
    If you are the rare, not braindead individual who understands what you bought what it does and what the 86's purpose is, you wouldn't be making cope threads.

    I just saw a GR86 at a gas station today, on my lunch break. I thought "Fricking cool"
    If the greighty-six owner is the type to talk about perf specs and whatever, I'd lose all respect. The car is supposed to be symbolic and a sort of best-in-class leader. In the same way the miata is a vehicle all to itself and the RX-7 despite not being the best of the 90s japanese cars STOCK, was indeed a God Machine from mods and in skilled hands.

    And yes, an 86 is more manly than a miata.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What do you autists think is more respectable a clapped frs/brz/86 or a heavily moded one

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stock > modded > clapped

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Honda F20c is the best 4 cylinder ever made.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Gets absolutely mogged by the K24 sorry m8

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >No vtec
    dogshit vtec rules

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *