*does more harm than good to your career*

*does more harm than good to your career*

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who was the last good US champ in your opinion?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lashley had a good run last time he had it. But I would say Cena was the last great champion.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        And the other one was the same

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cena. I have a nostalgic bias for his spinner belt run

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Logan Paul

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      theory

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cena

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Logan Paul

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Benoit.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Miz

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Theory made it seem important for a little while.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why does this belt exist? What benefit does it bring? How does having this belt in particular show the strength of a wrestler?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Its the 3rd place belt

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Its supposed to be the lower-mid card belt
      Should probably act as a TV title but it doesn't for some reason

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's the point of ANY nongimmicked belt that isn't a world title?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ideally TV title/European title was something for quick tv matches or something to give the undercard guys something to fight for, IC/US belt was supposed to be for either someone who could work good or someone who a company was grooming to be a world champion, tag/cruiserweight/womens are self explanatory.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >IC/US belt
          Okay but what's the kayfabe reason?
          More than that, what's even the kayfabe reason for the WWE belt? As far as I recall, it was just given to I believe Lesnar in order to have two champions on both shows. But it's fricking moronic.
          I mean, realistically, a company would have "one" show. And with that, they can have weight divisions, the women's title which is freeweight because there's not many naturally heavy women unless they're fat, and THEN you can have the WWE belt, to prove who's the best in the entire company. The weight division belts are just for the weight classes, but the E belt can be all weight, potentially even all gender, class. But then you'd have people b***hing about women winning against roided out guys and whatever.
          So if they want it to make sense, it should be
          >raw weight class belts
          >smackdown weight class belts
          >freeweight belts for both brands (gender optional)
          And that's it. There's no need for an international belt because that's under the assumption the belt can be cross promotion, as previous belts in other sports have been. And those are usually world wide, hence "intercontinental".
          US is unnecessary because WWE is already a US company. It would only make sense if there were a branch in other nations like Europe and Japan and whatever, or if all the companies shared regional belts together, which would never happen because of egoism and self marks.
          Actual gimmick belts (hardcore/24-7) are fine if they stay within their concept, but ones like hardcore are much more believable because it's representative of the style they're a champion of. Maybe something like a Shoot Wrestle Belt or Grappling Belt or something. But that would probably lead to more chaos since it would rely on a level of shoot and work wrestling that most wouldn't be able to handle without getting their egos hurt.
          TLDR: WWE is moronic and needs to downsize titles at some point.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        There is none. There should only be one belt

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          shut up moron

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    WCW's belt looked better.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    how so?

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    A legacy of the WWE/WCW takeover and subsequent "brand split." If they had stuck to it, you would have had a world title on each brand (old WWE and WCW champ belts) and one lesser belt on each brand (Intercontinental and U.S. belt). The U.S. belt was basically WCW's Intercontonental belt. WWE's belts, however, are all fricked up presently.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cena, JBL and Eddie all held it before they held the main belt, idiot.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >JBL

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *