Proof that the elites don't care about the environment at all is that this car was released 10 years ago and they've made no efforts in ensu...

Proof that the elites don't care about the environment at all is that this car was released 10 years ago and they've made no efforts in ensuring that it becomes used worldwide:

https://www.toyota.co.uk/hydrogen

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe because producing and transporting hydrogen is no more energy efficient than the gasoline infrastructure. After all, there is no more efficient way to get energy than harvesting the work the earth has done over millions of years by sucking it out of the ground and lighting it on fire.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >producing and transporting hydrogen
      The point is that the hydrogen will be made on the very own gas station, the problem here is that it takes a shitton of electricity to produce making it the complete opposite of what could be considered emissions free, or even cheap enough to be widely used.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      nothing wrong with gasoline, there's just too many people using it

      get rid of some people and the emissions aren't a problem.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How does getting rid of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, China and sub-Saharan Africa sound?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          throw in Europe, Canada, and the entire West coast of the US and you have a deal

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Throw in NYC and Israel and you have a deal.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Throw in all of the US and especially you homosexuals and you have a deal.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it has most of the disadvantages of FFs
      it has all the disadvantages of EVs
      none of the advantages of either
      you do not realise just how incredibly dangerous and difficult to handle liquid hydrogen is

      loads of people drive gasoline cars that also run on LPG in Europe. They don't really do random epically awesome environmentally friendly explosions and fires.

      LPG/CNG is infinitely better alternative
      you can run any combustion engine on it (with minimal modification), you produce very few pollution and you can relatively cheaply synthesise it from coal or even captured CO2
      and we already have infrastructure for it

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        come to the balkans, my friend.
        you either have LPG or diesel Black folk racing around.

        Very few gasoline purists (like me because i am better than everyone) around

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      How does titan have so much methane if it has no life forms? Did Titan have dinosaurs and trees?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Proof that the elites don't care about the environmen
    You are quite wrong. The economics of distributed hydrogen fueling stations across every country is not the only thing that stops it. The idea of having a huge number of hydrogen tanks out in the hands of would-be criminals is also a troublesome thing. When used "properly", the hydrogen can be quite destructive. And with such vehicles commonplace, that would essentially make hydrogen tanks available to the general criminal public.

    Until YOU can come up with reasons to offset the problems of:
    -- economics of owning such a car
    -- economics of obtaining hydrogen fuel
    -- economics of fueling transfer
    -- economics of fueling stations
    -- maintenance periods of hydrogen tanks
    -- misuse potential of hydrogen tanks
    ... then you should not criticize people for not having hydrogen cars being plentiful and promoted over EV.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Damn this is crazy. Can't believe they let EVs on the road at all with battery explosions like that.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What happened in the webm?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is he gonna be okay?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      loads of people drive gasoline cars that also run on LPG in Europe. They don't really do random epically awesome environmentally friendly explosions and fires.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >got btfo so hard in the other thread that he had to make a new one
    lol

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Proof that the elites don't care about the environment at all
    The real proof is letting the turd world in china, India, Africa, just do whatever the frick they want and pollute as much as they want with impunity, but they beat the white man down and call him evil for wanting a plastic bag. Yeah, they sure do give a damn huh.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >actual schizoposting

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >can’t refute so call him a schizo instead
        Nice one Chaim, that playbook isn’t worn the hell out or anything.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >>c-can't refute
          1-Look up any metric you want, energy consumption, fuel consumption, water, etc.
          2-Do you really expect the UN to decide 75% of the world is forbidden from developing and catching up to the Triad ?
          3-You're obviously arguing in bad faith, all just to justify some disgusting american muttoids feeling the need to burn ten gallons of fuel anytime they go slave for their israeli overlords.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Do you really expect the UN to decide 75% of the world is forbidden from developing and catching up to the Triad ?
            No, but I also don’t want them to behave as if they do, but in bad faith only apply this to western nations. You can get every American to stop using single use plastics and live in the pod, it still won’t matter if you let India shit all over everyone’s street metaphorically.
            >muh studies muh research
            Uh huh, bought and paid for by who? I don’t know if you’re intentionally a chud or maliciously ignorant, but neither is good

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            they don't apply "in bad faith only to western nations". they apply because the only way to enforce policy, outside of willing compliance (only an option for white people, because they are more intelligent) is naked force. China and India will not listen to a god damn thing white people say, because they are independent of the Western post-Enlightenment sociopolitical axis, and in fact deeply distrust them due to historical reasons which largely summarize to "the British". since they won't listen, the other option is obliterating them from the face of the planet.
            please come to your own conclusions about why the West is currently unwilling to vaporize either its own virtually-costless consumer goods ecumenofactory or the planned replacement for same after the first one modernizes out of its self-induced economic subjugation

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You can get every American to stop using single use plastics and live in the pod, it still won’t matter if you let India shit all over everyone’s street metaphorically.
            Wrong. India, China and all the other developing countries are in majority producing goods that are consumed by Americans. Disregarding your austistic schwabposting, the minute the US stops guzzling energy and goods the whole globalized market is left without its king. All those countries are just subservient laborers sweating so the average US man can takes mountains of loans to buy huge SUVs, houses, TVs, etc.
            >muh studies muh research
            If we aren't even basing the discussion on facts, what do you even want ?
            After checking the definition, I'm definitely not a chud, you however could very well be.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the vast majority of hydrogen is produced from methane, i.e. oil. the world does not yet have the excess nuclear generation capacity (available baseload > time-averaged demand) to industrially electrolytically produce hydrogen, thanks to decades of greenhomosexual and oil industry propaganda. aside from that, the real answer is , but without the anti-white conspiracy theory reasons; obviously the "consume less" propaganda efforts are targeted towards a population intelligent enough, willing enough, and able (economically) enough to comply with environmental protection efforts.
      and also NATO isn't willing to glass 54.5% of the global population to protect the biosphere.
      yet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      correct

      the vast majority of hydrogen is produced from methane, i.e. oil. the world does not yet have the excess nuclear generation capacity (available baseload > time-averaged demand) to industrially electrolytically produce hydrogen, thanks to decades of greenhomosexual and oil industry propaganda. aside from that, the real answer is , but without the anti-white conspiracy theory reasons; obviously the "consume less" propaganda efforts are targeted towards a population intelligent enough, willing enough, and able (economically) enough to comply with environmental protection efforts.
      and also NATO isn't willing to glass 54.5% of the global population to protect the biosphere.
      yet.

      utterly moronic

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        excellent argument thanks my mind is changed

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The people who make these threads have never worked with a hydrogen powered forklift, and it shows.
    >runs out of fuel quickly
    >if you let the fuel get too low you will permanently damage the fuel cell
    >you need to know what you’re doing to wrench on one and usually you need manufacturer service anyway for safety
    They’re EVs that are worse in every way EXCEPT that they charge in minutes instead of hours.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You aren't a mechanic and are just shitposting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *