Which one would you take?

Which one would DA take?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't personally want any of these.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They are literally all bad cars.

      >t. miatagay

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They are literally all bad cars.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the turd gen is fine

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >They are literally all bad cars.
      My first thought their all 30yo+ shitboxes
      Id take kitt because im at least familiar with sbcs

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Uh, the Batmobile? Duh. It has fricking machine guns and rocket launchers on it.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    as for me it's the lindsey lohan nascar herbie

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Damn I remember when she was hot

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In a similar vein of thought these come with a 1977 issue Sally Field.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Based and samepilled.

      I remember being a kid and actually seeing the movie car at Mid America Motorworks Beetle Funfest. Man I miss those days.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There is no plausible way it could have a door rub mark like that with those fenders.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's:

    1. 72 Torino
    2. 308
    3. Rossa

    The rest I could take over leave.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Damn I didn't see the XB lamao
      That's on there

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Frick all that homosexual shit. I'd take Sebuba's podracer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >not Rats Tyrell
      ngmi

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Testarossa. It's the only decent car out of the bunch.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Cocaine powered sex mobile

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    where's The Bandit?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Hands down the DB5

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Every time

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mad Max
    Fricking love battle cars

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The interceptor because I cbf'd dealing with LHD

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    testarossa and the van

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pursuit Special

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Gimme the delorean without the movie shit all over it. I love those things.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You are literally the only one. I have met and known at least three DeLorean owners, and they all hate them and wish they could get rid of them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Fair enough, the one delorean owner I met was sick of it and trying to get rid of it too.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    308 GTS is sexy as frick

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It really was a gorgeous car.
      But
      >3,000 pounds
      >240-255hp
      Performance was on par with a fox body mustang.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Where are you sourcing your information? The '85 Mustang GT had 210hp. Dinos/308s are slower than shit and don't forget those "240hp" were Italian, so it was more like 200.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I guess Motorweek didn't test the 308 BITD, so here's C&D for the Mustang too.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >under 50cc
            >rounded up

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >five point oh
            Sounds better than
            >four point nine
            Especially because the Camaro/Firebird 305 was actually 5L, and Ford didn't want GM to run with "our engines are bigger".
            >uhm 350/5.7
            Ford had the 5.8 351 at the time, though admittedly not in the Mustang.

            Metric is a meme anyway and nobody cared. We all knew it was a 302.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >'79 302 - 140hp
            >'80/'81 - 302 Discontinued
            >'82 302 HO - 160hp
            >'83/'84 302 HO - 175hp
            >'85 302 HO -210hp
            So basically you did the least research possible before saying something moronic like
            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >made significantly less power until the year the Ferrari was replaced with a far more powerful model

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And in 1985 a Ferrari 328 made 270hp from a 3.2L V8

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >made significantly less power until the year the Ferrari was replaced with a far more powerful model

            >says something stupid
            >proceeds to move goalposts
            Lol.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >still can't cope with the fact that the contemporary (go search what that means) Foxbody was significantly underpowered compared to the 308
            Foxbody 5.slows peaked at 225hp, by then the 348 was out and was making over 300hp

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >still can't cope with the fact the 302 made 210hp while the 308 was produced
            There is no reason to move goalposts from this other than trying to look less moronic. Which isn't working. Also, the 348 didn't debut in 1987 like the 225hp 302, and it "peaked" with the underrated 235hp '93 Cobra. So if anything you're only making yourself look more stupid.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Are you talking about the '85? Because that's the year the 328 came out. Both the 308 and 328 made more power from a smaller engine than the most powerful factory Foxbody
            The more you argue this the more dumber you look

            >the 348 didn't debut in 1987
            Certified moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Actually nah I'm the moron, read that as 348
            Point still stands, they all made more power than the Foxbody

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Both the 308 and 328 made more power from a smaller engine than the most powerful factory Foxbody

            Actually nah I'm the moron, read that as 348
            Point still stands, they all made more power than the Foxbody

            >Point still stands, they all made more power than the Foxbody
            That wasn't the point you illiterate. See

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            You're blowing hot air over not being able to read and looking moronic in the process.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >1979 V8 Mustang made 140hp
            >1979 308 made 240hp
            Where's the lie?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >during the same years

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >1979 Mustang and 1979 308 weren't made in the same year
            Go choke on a bag of dicks

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >years implies one specific model year
            Are you really not pretending to be moronic? This is just sad at this point.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Do you want me to mention how the Mustang got an even weaker V8 in 1980-1981 that only made 120hp instead?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, I want you to read. I already said the 302 was pulled for '80 and '81

            >'79 302 - 140hp
            >'80/'81 - 302 Discontinued
            >'82 302 HO - 160hp
            >'83/'84 302 HO - 175hp
            >'85 302 HO -210hp
            So basically you did the least research possible before saying something moronic like
            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            This has gone from sad to pathetic.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The only pathatic thing here is the 120hp V8 Mustang and the moron defending it against a fricking Ferrari

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/tcy4rY6.png

            >wake up
            >wonder why my post has so many replies
            >it's the same moron quoting it over and over again
            Utterly mindbroken Foxbodygay holy kek

            >tripling down on moronation
            >still won't admit what he said was egregiously stupid
            Lol.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            There's one gay cherry picking here anon and it's not the guy comparing a 1975 ferrari to a 1979 mustang

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Cherry picking would be comparing only '79 to '79 after specifically saying.

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp
            Now use your brain before posting next time.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >yeah but this ONE YEAR, at the very end of the ferrari's production, when it was 10 years old, the mustang made more power.... well still less have power than the Ferrari... but more less power
            It's a pathetic argument anon, just admit that the ferrari perfromance was actually considerably higher than a fox body mustang.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            See

            https://i.imgur.com/r3JWoHG.png

            I guess Motorweek didn't test the 308 BITD, so here's C&D for the Mustang too.

            https://i.imgur.com/yEvIebT.png

            >mustang is faster and brakes better
            What cope is next? One can only wonder.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >10 years later, as the ferrari was about to be replaced, one (1) (ONE) mustang finally managed to test maybe slightly possibly a tiny bit better
            >this proves my original point that the ferrari's performance was inadequate

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >this proves my original point that the ferrari's performance was inadequate
            Where was that point ever supposedly interjected? Why are you so moronic? The only point that was being made was that the Mustang made more than 160hp during the 308s production. Everything else is cope/seethe about how that Anon said something wrong and I corrected his mistake. Also, even the 160hp '82 Mustang was quicker than the "240hp" 308.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The only point that was being made was that the Mustang made more than 160hp during the 308s production.
            My mistake, he only claimed 140hp.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >how do reply chains work
            Go on anon - follow the links all the way up to the original post then read the reply to it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Seemingly you can't figure that out.

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            https://i.imgur.com/1OU6ONV.png

            Where are you sourcing your information? The '85 Mustang GT had 210hp. Dinos/308s are slower than shit and don't forget those "240hp" were Italian, so it was more like 200.

            >The '85 Mustang GT had 210hp

            https://i.imgur.com/yyGOHc8.png

            >cherry picks '79 only

            >'79 302 - 140hp
            >'80/'81 - 302 Discontinued
            >'82 302 HO - 160hp
            >'83/'84 302 HO - 175hp
            >'85 302 HO -210hp
            So basically you did the least research possible before saying something moronic like
            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            >lists all foxbody years the 308 was produced
            Now again, use your brain before you post next time and make a cogent point.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >>this proves my original point that the ferrari's performance was inadequate

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're seemingly under the impression that I wasn't just correcting what that moron said. Cope and seethe moron. Also

            It really was a gorgeous car.
            But
            >3,000 pounds
            >240-255hp
            Performance was on par with a fox body mustang.

            wasn't even wrong considering the objective performance recordings posted ITT. So what will your next cope post be about?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >jumps into a conversation without stipulating that he's a different anon
            >wonders why he spends the next 100 replies never finding a middle ground with the other anon when they're making two different arguments
            Based moron, was it really that hard just to write "NTA but the mustangs made a lot more power a few years later"? It would have saved the thread a lot of useless posts.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >nooooooo, you can't simply correct someone without stating you're a different anon
            Extremely weird cope, how would that have saved the people replying to me from going off topic and moving goalposts anyway?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Of course you can anon, but you're going to spend another hundred replies arguing that the mustang did have a variance in power during those years while the other anon argues that the ferrari had better performance during all those years and you'll never agree because you're making two completely different points.
            But hey! Perhaps you like that sort of thing - gives you something to do while you shit up the thread with a hundred replies.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >because you're making two completely different points.
            How do you figure that? The person that I replied to was specifically talking about power, not performance. He even replied about hp since I asked him for his source.

            https://i.imgur.com/yyGOHc8.png

            You're literally making shit up in your head like a schizo or projecting about being the one trying to move the discussion from hp to "performance".

            So now lets start all over since you're having such a hard time with this.
            >The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp
            Is a false statement, it also made 160hp, 175hp and 210hp over the same years. Now if you want to argue that point without moving goalposts or coping about something else moronic be my guest.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you figure that?
            The proof is that you keep talking about "moving goalposts" because the other anon keeps going back to arguing about THE ORIGINAL POINT OF THE ARGUMENT which you consider to be moving the goalposts from the point you made when you jumped in halfway through without ever explaining that you were jumping in halfway through and had no interest in pursuing the original point of the argument.
            Like I said - you can do this moronic shit if you want to, but it's pretty silly.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The Countach will allways be the superior 80s playboy mobile

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >puts on pagani design seamaster 300m homage "homage"
    yup its db5 time

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Falcon XB. Love that supercharger whine.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    turd gen albeit with a 5.7 and ditch the gay tv series front

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The one that is the least popular and most contrarian

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If I couldn't turn around and flip it, the Firebird. If I could, the Aston.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it wasn't a 72 ford torino, it was a 74.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    DB5. I would sell it and would probably be able to afford any of the other cars with some change left over.

    But really I would spend the money to get the actual movie car I want.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The only logical answer to op.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The General Lee. Fill it with dynamite and do a sick jump off a ramp into a synagogue and while time freezes right before impact Waylon Jennings says >“Them Duke Boys didn’t take kindly to being called cattle, guess they’ll show these israelites the cow really can jump over the moon”

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the time machine

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >American pop culture hasn't produced an iconic "movie car" in 35 years

    Sad. Maybe Brian's Orange Supra? Even then that was over 20 years ago.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There's the Bumblebee Camaro and the Nolan Batmobile is pretty iconic too.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Zoomies are obsessed with the Red Subaru from Baby Driver. There's also the Audis from the Transporter movies, and the DB10 concept from Spectre I think.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    time machine so i can go back in time, get rich and buy all them cars and frick hoes.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I would take the Van or Caddy

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >doesn't include the Dodge M4s Turbo Interceptor.
    Shit list.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    KITT because I need someone to talk with during my cruising. And its self driving (but good) so I can sleep behind the wheel

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Last of the V8 interceptors

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why the wheels have to be so gay

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    DB5 for resale value. Then buy the ghostbusters car with some of the cash. Cruise around yelling "who you gonna call?" to hot chicks for shits and giggles.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I've got a '68 Chevy, with pipes on the side

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Camarenger SScatpack

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >honky culture cars
    Frick off as a wh*teboi

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'll take the '87 Caprice from Robocop.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I only remember the Taurus from Robocop, and the tanker I guess.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If I had to daily drive it the Firebird.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    DB5 or Falcon, while ferraris are cool and there are more iconic cars (yes, even more iconic than bond), I don't think anything besides the wildly impractical batmobile would be as cool as those two

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >the goalposts was moved when the anon compared the performance of the ferrari to the performance of the mustang
    (which was the original goalpost of the original argument btw)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      see

      https://i.imgur.com/yEvIebT.png

      https://i.imgur.com/r3JWoHG.png

      I guess Motorweek didn't test the 308 BITD, so here's C&D for the Mustang too.

      That Anon wasn't wrong. But the guy claiming the Mustang only made 140hp up until '85 was. Which is the point you're so desperately trying to miss on purpose.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >cherry pick the 1985 mustang against the 1977 ferrari
        >not wrong
        based moron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >make claim about "years"
          >gets mad when someone points out the most powerful version within those years

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >say anon wasn't wrong fox saying X
            >now change that to saying Y

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >objective performance stats
            vs
            >incorrect blanket statement
            Holy frick you're an actual moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The problem is the cherry picked 1977 Ferrari you brainlet.
            Obviously if you were comparing the performance of a Ferrari model to a Ford model you would try to keep it balanced by using cars of approximately the same year right?

            You have a very low comprehension of the points other people are making, it explains why you end up making so many pointless replies arguing about pointless things in pointless threads.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The problem is the cherry picked 1977 Ferrari you brainlet.
            The 308 made the same power over the years, unlike the Mustang marble brain. That's literally the whole point and why it doesn't matter what year 308 you compare. The Ford didn't only make 140hp up until '85 when the 308 ended production.

            You have a very low comprehension of the actual topic at hand. It explains why you keep moving goalposts and talking in circles. Again, lets start all over at

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            Do you think that this was a correct, or incorrect statement?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The 308 made the same power over the years
            No it didn't lol, it didn't even have the same number of valves in 1985 lol.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            '85 308s in America were still rated at 240hp Anon lol.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Did the power remain the same?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, due to different emissions regs the U.S. spec quattrovalve was also 240hp.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >the power remained the same over the years
            (the power didn't remain the same)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >American market cars also suffered a performance hit due to a compression ratio of 8.6:1 vs 9.2:1 for most of the rest of the world state emissions legislation which reduced horsepower.
            Yes, it stayed the same. Also, funny how you went right back off topic. Again, lets start all over at

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            Do you think that this was a correct, or incorrect statement?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No it really did not stay the same over the years anon, and it's very telling that you cannot admit this mistake.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >started at 240
            >ended at 240
            Were you wanting me to mention the time it made LESS than 240hp? Again, lets start all over at

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            Do you think that this was a correct, or incorrect statement? It's very telling that you cannot admit this mistake.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >it stayed the same over the years
            (It didn't stay the same over the years)
            >what? You want me to admit it didn't stay the same over the years?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So what was the point of

            >The 308 made the same power over the years
            No it didn't lol, it didn't even have the same number of valves in 1985 lol.

            You were trying to make a pithy point like the 4V was a godsend. Like I said the 308 was originally rated at 240hp, and so was the Quattrovalve. Again, lets start all over at

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            Do you think that this was a correct, or incorrect statement? It's very telling that you cannot admit this mistake and are actively avoiding the question.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Like I said the 308 was originally rated at 240hp, and so was the Quattrovalve
            Hahahaha that's literally not what you said and now you've changed it lol

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Definitely one of the Ferraris.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I mean you literally said it stayed the same over the years, but it didn't stay the same, so now you're pretending that you said something different instead of simply admitting that it didn't stay the same but making your point.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I mean you literally said it stayed the same over the years, but it didn't stay the same, so now you're pretending that you said something different instead of simply admitting that it didn't stay the same but making your point.
      Lol. You mean just like

      The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

      that started this whole drawn out shitshow. Because you still can't admit that was an incorrect statement? It's very telling that you cannot admit this mistake.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >still won't admit it
        >resorts to whatabout the other anon
        You have problems buddy

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Admit what? Supposedly I'm cherry picking for comparing a 240hp 308, then you make a pithy comment about the Quattrovalve which was rated at the same power. You still haven't made a point.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Admit that the power didnt stay the same over the years lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Like I already posted

            https://i.imgur.com/ydM28KZ.png

            >started at 240
            >ended at 240
            Were you wanting me to mention the time it made LESS than 240hp? Again, lets start all over at [...]
            Do you think that this was a correct, or incorrect statement? It's very telling that you cannot admit this mistake.

            there are years it made less than 240hp? Again, you accuse of cherry picking with the 240hp version, for comparison then offer the Quattrovalve which made the same hp to contrast. Why are you so hell bent on semantics in this case while

            The V8 in the Foxbody made during the same years as the 308 made only 140hp

            is an outright incorrect statement?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >still won't admit it
            Anon this is getting sad.
            You could admit what you said is wrong and then STILL MAKE YOUR POINT, but you're so dysfunctional you can't even admit a simple mistake and so here we are - still hung up on it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're right Anon. This is sad. You're completely avoiding the actual point that the 302 made more than 140hp up to '85. But I'm sure you'll cope and seethe about that egregious mistake some more.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >back to whatabout the other anon

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >wake up
    >wonder why my post has so many replies
    >it's the same moron quoting it over and over again
    Utterly mindbroken Foxbodygay holy kek

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably the GMC Vandura cause the puppers can fit in there and it's practical to transport stuff.

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Falcon 100%

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *